Don’t have a MY edanz account yet? 
Create your free account now and download this e-book. 

Free PDF e-book 

Most readers will read an article’s Abstract to decide whether the study is relevant to them and whether the full paper should be downloaded (which may need payment). Some journals send only the abstract of a paper to editorial staff or editorial board members to decide if the paper should be sent for peer review.  

Your abstract should therefore reflect the high quality of your study and summarize its most important findings and conclusions.  

It should:

  • be clear, concise, and accurate 
  • be easily understood: avoid uncommon abbreviations and jargon; in general, use abbreviations only if the abbreviation appears three times or more after its initial definition 
  • be independent (stand-alone), without referring to the main text or any of the illustrations (tables or figures) 
  • not contain illustrations, although some journals now ask for an additional “graphical abstract” 
  • not contain any citations, but if they are allowed, the references are usually included within the text rather than as a footnote 
  • contain some keywords 

You may find it useful to draft your abstract early on (a “working abstract”) as a guide for your paper’s structure and message, and then revise it at the end. Check the guidelines of your target journal for the word count, format, and style of its abstracts.  

There may or may not be a heading, and there may be subheadings (such as Background, Methods, Results, and Conclusions, in a “structured abstract”) or just one or two paragraphs without subheadings (in an “unstructured abstract”). 

Regardless of the format, your abstract should answer the following four questions: 

  • Why was this research conducted? 
  • What was the specific aim/objective and main approach of the study? 
  • What were the main findings? 
  • Why are these findings useful and important? 

Check your target journal for special instructions—for example: 

  • Do different article types have different styles of abstract? 
  • Should non-technical language be used or a non-technical abstract also prepared? 
  • Is the style descriptive (topic, aim, and only a preview of the paper’s contents) or informative (including results and conclusion)? 
  • Are key data and statistics expected in the results? 
  • Should extra information (e.g., limitations or implications) be added? 
  • Is only passive voice or a mixture of active and passive allowed, and what tenses are expected? 

If you keep the above tips in mind, you can write an effective abstract that will attract more readers (and journal editors!) to your research. Good luck! 

The placement of medical research news on a newspaper’s front page is intended to gain the public’s attention, so it is important to understand the source of the news in terms of research maturity and evidence level.

Explanation: Subheadings are used because this journal requires a structured abstract. Note that the authors have mainly used the active voice. The Background provides the reader with the major research question. 

We searched LexisNexis to identify medical research reported on front pages of major newspapers published from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2002. We used MEDLINE and Google Scholar to find journal articles corresponding to the research, and determined their evidence level. 

Of 734 front-page medical research stories identified, 417 (57%) referred to mature research published in peer-reviewed journals. The remaining 317 stories referred to preliminary findings presented at scientific or press meetings; 144 (45%) of those stories mentioned studies that later matured (i.e. were published in journals within 3 years after news coverage). The evidence-level distribution of the 515 journal articles quoted in news stories reporting on mature research (3% level I, 21% level II, 42% level III, 4% level IV, and 31% level V) differed from that of the 170 reports of preliminary research that later matured (1%, 19%, 35%, 12%, and 33%, respectively; chi-square test, P = .0009). No news stories indicated evidence level. Fewer than 1 in 5 news stories reporting preliminary findings acknowledged the preliminary nature of their content.

Explanation: In this combined Methods/Results section, the Methods subsection is quite short and the Results subsection makes up the largest proportion of the Abstract, because the reader is most interested in what you discovered. The order of the results goes from general to specific facts, and key data are included. The verb tense is the simple past because the study and analyses have finished. However, theoretical and modeling studies often use present tense throughout the abstract.

Only 57% of front-page stories reporting on medical research are based on mature research, which tends to have a higher evidence level than research with preliminary findings. Medical research news should be clearly referenced and state the evidence level and limitations to inform the public of the maturity and quality of the source. 

Explanation: The major conclusion should be the first thing presented in this section. Here, the journal requires that the implications of the findings are also stated.

Final thoughts

If you keep the above tips in mind, you can write an effective abstract that will attract more readers (and journal editors!) to your research. Good luck! 

Other content you might enjoy

Video blog

Four Questions That Every ABSTRACT Should Answer

Dr. Gareth Dyke explains the easy, effective way to write the abstract for your paper — just by writing short answers to FOUR simple questions. 

Support services

Graphical Abstracts

Our scientific graphics experts will create a clear, easy to understand graphical summary capturing your objective, approach, results and key conclusions.

Course / Tool

Writing a Research Manuscript Step-by-Step

Learn how to write a complete manuscript with the powerful, secure AuthorPath™ tool

Scroll to Top